Upaya Menghadapi Segregasi Sosial dan Bidat: Analisis Sosial-Ilmiah Kolose 2:16-23
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46974/ms.v5i2.130Keywords:
Colossians, heresy, congregational unity, social groups, social segregationAbstract
Colossians 2:16-23 is often used as a reference to identify heresies in Colossae. This identification was later assessed as part of Paul's strategy so that the Colossian church could finally face the heresy. So, is the problem of heresy the only problem in the congregation? Unfortunately, a number of interpreters tend to pay less attention to the other social issue. This article wants to show that the idea of the unity of the church, as a body, and Christ, as its head, in this text (v. 19) also indicates the existence of social segregation that was hitting the Colossian church. To prove the above hypothesis, the authors conducted qualitative research with data collection through literature studies. The hermeneutic theory used to interpret the Colossians is Social Scientific Criticism. As a result, it appears that the "group" traditions that were so prominent and strong in Mediterranean society at that time were proven to have resulted in social segregation. That is why v. 19 eventually emerged and became part of the strategy to deal with the problems at Colossae, including the social segregation.
References
Aristoteles. (2018). Retorika. BASABASI.
Arnold, C. E. (1996). The Colossian Syncretism: The Interface between Christianity and Folk Belief at Colossae. Baker Books.
Ascough, R. S. (2004). A question of death: Paul’s community-building language in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18. Journal of Biblical Literature, 123(3), 509–530. https://doi.org/10.2307/3268045
Barth, M., & Blanke, H. (1994). The Anchor Bible: Colossians. Doubleday.
Barus, A. (2017). Tafsir Alkitab Kontekstual-Oikumenis: Surat Kolose. BPK Gunung Mulia.
Bruce, F. F. (1984). The Epistles to the Colossians, to Philemon, and to the Ephesians. Wm. B. Eerdmands.
Creswell, J. W., & Craeswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publication.
Dunn, J. D. G. (1996). The Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon. The Paternoster Press.
Duyverman, M. E. (2015). Pembimbing ke dalam Perjanjian Baru. BPK Gunung Mulia.
Echols, J. M., & Shadily, H. (1975). An English-Indonesian Dictionary. Cornell University Press.
Elliott, J. H. (1993a). Social-Scientific Criticism of the New Testament: An Introduction. SPCK.
Elliott, J. H. (1993b). What Is Social-Scientific Criticism? Fortress Press.
Groenen, C. (1984). Pengantar ke dalam Perjanjian Baru. Kanisius.
Grudem, W. (1985). Does Κεφαλη (“Head”) Mean “Source” Or “Authority Over” in Greek Literature? Trinity Journal, 6(1), 38–59.
Hakh, S. B. (2010). Perjanjian Baru: Sejarah Pengantar dan Pokok-pokok Teologisnya. Bina Media Indonesia.
Hayes, J. H., & Holladay, C. R. (1993). Pedoman Dasar Penafsiran Alkitab. BPK Gunung Mulia.
Hooker, M. D. (2003). Colossian. In J. D. G. Dunn & J. W. Rogerson (Eds.), Eerdmans Commentary on the Bible (pp. 1404–1412). Eerdmans.
Hurtado, L. W. (2003). Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. Wm. B. Eerdmands.
Kennedy, G. A. (1963). The Art of Persuasion in Greece: A History of Rhetoric Vol 1. Princeton University Press.
Kennedy, G. A. (1972). The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World 300 B.C. - A.D. 300. Princeton University Press.
Lohse, E. (1971). Colossians and Philemon. Fortress Press.
Malina, B. J., & Pilch, J. J. (2013). Social-Science Commentary on the Deutero-Pauline Letters. Fortress Press.
Marshall, H., Travis, S., & Paul, I. (2002). Exploring The New Testament Vol. 2. SPCK.
Moo, D. J. (2008). The Letters to the Colossians and to Philemon. Wm. B. Eerdmands.
Moritz, F. J. (1988). Church as Body. Calvary Baptist Theological Journal, 1–24.
O’Brien, P. T. (1982). Colossians-Philemon. Word Books Publisher.
Osborne, G. R. (2012). Spiral Hermeneutika: Pengantar Komprehensif bagi Penafsiran Alkitab. Momentum.
Sarimin, A. D. (2020). Dipenuhi di dalam Kristus Perspektif Surat Kolose sebagai Landasan bagi Gereja dalam Melayani Masyarakat. Voice of Wesley: Jurnal Ilmiah Musik Dan Agama, 3(2), 1–14.
Sianturi, R. P. (2013). MEMAKNAI PLEROMA ( KEPENUHAN KEALLAHAN ) KRISTUS DALAM RELASI INTERRELIGIUS DI INDONESIA Tafsiran Kontekstual Atas Kolose 2 : 6-15. Gema Teologi, 37(1), 1–28.
Stambaugh, J., & Balch, D. (1994). Dunia Sosial Kekristenan Mula-Mula. BPK Gunung Mulia.
Stambaugh, J., & Balch, D. (1997). Dunia Sosial Kekristenan Mula-Mula. BPK Gunung Mulia.
Sumney, J. L. (2008). Colossians: A Commentary. Westminster John Knox Press.
Surbakti, P. H., Pori, R. D., & Sabaritno, E. (2022). MAMASA-KRISTEN DAN KEMATIAN ANGGOTA KELUARGANYA: Dialog yang Memperkaya antara 1 Tesalonika 4:14 dan Aluk Toyolo. Indonesian Journal of Theology, 10(1), 22–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46567/ijt.v10i1.239
Talbert, C. H. (2007). Ephesians and Colossians. Baker Academic.
Tenney, M. C. (1985). Survei Perjanjian Baru. Gandum Mas.
Vergeer, W. C. (1994). ΣΚΙΑ and ΣΩΜΑ The Strategy of Contextualisation in Colossian 2:17. A Contribution to the Quest for a Legitimate Contextual Theology Today. NEOTESTAMENTICA, 28(2), 379–393.
Witherington III, B. (2007). The Letters to Philemon, the Colossians, and the Ephesians: A Socio- Rhetorical Commentary on the Captivity Epistles. Wm. B. Eerdmands. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9418.2008.00419_9.x